JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 24, 2018

A- de 2018

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Linares Cantillo

✓Claimant Hernando Jose Castro Palma

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Negado porque actor no estructuró cargo de omisión legislativa
  • Incumplimiento de requisitos de especificidad y suficiencia
  • Finalidad
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

El rechazo de la demanda se dio porque el demandante no logró poner de presente de manera suficiente, el deber específico que la Constitución le impone al Legislador respecto del término preciso y determinado para el envío de la notificación por aviso, lo cual implicó el incumplimiento del requisito de especificidad.

Se CONFIRMA el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el Auto del quince (15) de agosto de dos mil dieciocho (2018), por medio del cual se rechazó la demanda de inconstitucionalidad con radicado D-12769.
  2. SEGUNDO. A través de la Secretaría General de la Corte, comuníquese el contenido de esta decisión a la parte demandante, indicándole que contra esta no procede recurso alguno.
  3. TERCERO. Ejecutoriada esta decisión, archívese el expediente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.